Select Page

This is FCPA Whistleblower clipart.FCPA whistleblowers often ask whether they should report their bribery information internally prior to submitting to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under the Dodd-Frank reward program. Though there are pros and cons both ways, I typically advise employees to file first with the SEC (unless they are internal audit and compliance personnel). As background, international whistleblowers are eligible for large rewards for reporting corporate bribery under the Dodd-Frank reward program.

The primary reason I often advise employees working outside the United States to file first with the SEC is that if they later report internally to their companies and suffer retaliation, they have the ability to bring suit under Dodd-Frank’s anti-retaliation provisions. If employees working outside the United States report internally first and suffer retaliation prior to filing with the SEC, some courts have held that they cannot bring an anti-retaliation case under Dodd-Frank’s whistleblower program. It should be noted that the SEC takes the position that Dodd-Frank’s anti-retaliation protections should apply to foreign employees who report first internally but that issue is currently unsettled. From the employee’s perspective, it is much safer at this time to file with the SEC first.

Moreover, many FCPA whistleblowers do not want to ever report internally because they fear retaliation and the potential impact reporting may have on obtaining future employment in their industries if it is learned that they blew the whistle on their former companies. For those clients, there is only one decision, which is to submit their corporate bribery information confidentially without ever reporting internally. And this is a perfectly acceptable position to take.

One small drawback to filing with the SEC and not reporting internally is that one of the factors that is considered when deciding what percentage, which typically ranges from 10% to 30%, to award a qualifying whistleblower is whether the whistleblower reported internally. So from that perspective only, the lack of an internal report could be viewed as a small negative.

If someone has information about corporate bribery connected to an SEC-regulated company and would like to discuss their reporting options, please feel free to contact me at for a free consultation. For more information and details about the Dodd-Frank reward program, please click here. And for more details about how the reward program applies to FCPA whistleblowers, please click here.


Andy Rickman is an FCPA whistleblower attorney who has filed Dodd-Frank reward submissions for international clients residing in more than 50 different countries. He is based in Washington, DC where Dodd-Frank reward submissions are filed and the SEC is headquartered. Mr. Rickman offers a free consultation to anyone who would like to discuss whether he or she has a Dodd-Frank reward eligible case. Please feel free to contact him at